[MD] Heads or tails?

[David M]

Hi Krim

Cause is the wrong word and not the point I am trying to make.
Future event is also the wrong concept, as events are actual and present
and I'd not suggest any future pre-existence.

Rather I am pointing out that in processes that have tendencies of outcome
rather than certainties of outcome, there is implied in such a process a set
of possible states, only one of which will become actual, and therefore what
becomes actual is limited by the possibilities available. Beyond these lie
the impossible, but within what is possible a choice has to be made, it is
called the collapse of the wave function by physicists, where as Dirac
says 'nature makes a choice', at the human level we just say we make our 
existential
choice.

David M


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Krimel" <Krimel at Krimel.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Heads or tails?


> [David M]
> I think an interference pattern of possible locations of an electron or 
> any
> particle is the best example I know.
>
> [Krimel]
> How does this suggest that a future even is causing the present?
>
>
>
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>