[MD] Heads or tails?

[David M]

Hi Ron

You old skeptic, lucky you were not
around for the big bang, would you have
ever believed we could have got here?

David M


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Kulp" <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Heads or tails?


> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
> [mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Krimel
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 1:22 PM
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> 
> [Krimmel]
> I think Pirsig and certainly many of the MoQers do not really get how
> interesting this is. Note Pirsig's dismissal of the idea that the MoQ
> would be a metaphysics of randomness. Boy, he missed the boat by not
> running with that idea.
> 
> {Ron]
> I agree, a metaphysics of randomness would be more accurate and would
> not elude
> To misinterpretation that the term "moral" may imply. Fact is we just do
> not know.
> An inter-related system of dynamic value is about as close as we can get
> 
> On any sort of concept. I dunno, I get what others say about it but
> maybe it is my
> Preconception that makes me fidgety over "moral" or "betterness"
> ... I just have a hard time with the idea
> that this is all headed somewhere. 'Good' seems to me is what is most
> suitable for survival
> That which secures continuance in the value field as currently
> manifested.
> 
> 
> 
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>