[MD] Heads or tails?

[Ron Kulp]

[David M]

I do not think the fact that change can be destructive helps much to
understand the creative capacities this universe clearly exhibits. Back
to the excluded middle again.

[Ron]
Please elaborate, I don't quite get what it is you are saying then.




----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Kulp" <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Heads or tails?


> 
> [David M]
> You old skeptic, lucky you were not
> around for the big bang, would you have
> ever believed we could have got here?
> 
> [Ron]
> Our evolution is largely the result of geologic and cosmic fortune. A
> celestrial impact or two,
> and who knows? If the impact theorized to have wiped out the dinosaurs
> would have never happened
> I hardly think we'd be sipping tea and talking  philosophy. What
> happened? Did quality
> Say nah, that's not what I wanted, I'm supposed to evolve into a
> chemistry professor!
> Yes David, I'm skeptical of the human minds ability to comprehend the
> infinite.
> I'm afraid this monster has no zipper on the back.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ron Kulp" <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com>
> To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 7:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [MD] Heads or tails?
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
>> [mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Krimel
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 1:22 PM
>> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>> 
>> [Krimmel]
>> I think Pirsig and certainly many of the MoQers do not really get how
>> interesting this is. Note Pirsig's dismissal of the idea that the MoQ
>> would be a metaphysics of randomness. Boy, he missed the boat by not
>> running with that idea.
>> 
>> {Ron]
>> I agree, a metaphysics of randomness would be more accurate and would
>> not elude
>> To misinterpretation that the term "moral" may imply. Fact is we just
> do
>> not know.
>> An inter-related system of dynamic value is about as close as we can
> get
>> 
>> On any sort of concept. I dunno, I get what others say about it but
>> maybe it is my
>> Preconception that makes me fidgety over "moral" or "betterness"
>> ... I just have a hard time with the idea
>> that this is all headed somewhere. 'Good' seems to me is what is most
>> suitable for survival
>> That which secures continuance in the value field as currently
>> manifested.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> moq_discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>> moq_discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>
> 
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>

moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/