[MD] (MD] Collective intelligence
Horse
horse at darkstar.uk.net
Sat May 12 09:55:44 PDT 2007
Hi Folks
Before we get into another pointless political debate about the
wonderfulness of the magnificent individual versus the marvelous
collective could we try and think about this maybe from a slightly
better perspective - i.e. mine! :)
The term 'collective intelligence', IMO, is probably a misnomer in terms
of the MoQ as it, incorrectly, appears to conjoin social and
intellectual patterns.
It may be better to think of it as 'collective knowledge' which can then
be placed at the social level as patterns that accumulate and persist
over time within a social context.
All learned behaviours and other forms of knowledge that persist from
one generation to the next but are not transmitted by biological means
can now be neatly placed in this holder. Anything from how to crack an
oyster open to the mangled grunts that constitute primitive language can
be included, as can more complex language and whatever other social
patterns you choose to include. When this 'collective knowledge' becomes
sufficiently ordered and complex emergent patterns will start to appear
- for an example think in terms of how a city develops and persists over
many decades and even centuries.
Awareness and contemplation of these patterns gradually gives rise to
ordering and restructuring which leads to intellectual activity and the
emergence of the intellectual level. So just as the biological patterns
of life are available to the social level, so the developing social
patterns of collective knowledge are available to the intellectual level.
Any thoughts?
Horse
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list