[MD] Collective intelligence
Micah
micah at roarkplumbing.com
Mon May 14 14:24:52 PDT 2007
Ian,
You and Platt have given your cats all the attributes of "self". "Self",
like all concepts, is human and cannot apply to cats or any animals. That
would require a non human point of view (there are no other points of view -
"point of view" itself is a uniquely human concept) and humans can only have
a human point of view, so to know that cats think is an affirmation of
"collective consciousness" (which is not possible because I cannot be anyone
other than me or to quote the great philosopher Popeye - "I am what I am and
that's all I am!"; to assume, which you and Platt are doing, is
anthropomorphization. Aaaaaand we're back! Man is the measure of all things.
Micah
<Hi Platt, leaving cat language itself aside, as I suggested ...
<What the cat can communicate with you is one thing, but I doubt the
<cat has any conception of itself to communicate in any way. Like, I
<doubt your cat could communicate the difference between "I'm hungry"
<and "this similar cat next to me is hungry".
<You, a relatively intelligent human - relative to your cat that is ;-)
<- infer the cat is talking about itself because it is "talking", and
<the two of you have some learned behaviors.
<Your cat (my cat too) has all the attributes of self except the
<slightest evidence it can even conveive of it itself, let alone
<communicate it.
<Ian
>
> My cat has all the attributes of a "self" except complex language. But
"himself"
> has no problem communicating his needs to me.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list