[MD] Collective intelligence (Granger)

[ian glendinning]

Micah,

You said
>
> > When I follow your thinking out to it's logical conclusion, it ends with Big
> > Brother, because it's premise is; that people can't be trusted with freedom.
> > Oddly, so does Platt's.
>

Almost spot on. Catch-22 I call it. The issue is that that conclusion
is some kind of presumption, but it is not a "logical" conclusion, nor
in any sense a necessary or quality conclusion. We're trying to have
the debate without that "knee jerk".

Ian