[MD] Social Darwinism
Krimel
Krimel at Krimel.com
Fri May 18 07:08:28 PDT 2007
[dmb]
Or so it seems to me. If there is a way to make the MOQ compatible with the
theory of memes, it would surprize me. I thought the MOQ replaced the
mechanized view of evolution in favor a volitional one even at the
biological level. So to then transfer darwinian mechanisms to the evolution
of language seems to reverse the correction and double the error. What could
be worse than a mechanistic, materialistic theory of meaning? Isn't "Meme"
exactly the kind of absurdity we get when we try to explain culture in terms
of material and mechanical operations? I think so.
[Krimel]
So Dave, you think ideas and societies do not evolve? Or do they evolve on
the basis of some supernatural principle?
Volitional evolution? Is that like eugenics or Think and Grow Rich? You know
there was this guy Lamarck and he claimed...
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list