[MD] Social Darwinism

[Krimel]

 [SA]
Krimel, I still ask the same question.  Notice in
the post in which I question this same value that dmb
has, and others, in which by improvement, are they
saying 'in addition to' or 'options', as in biological
doesn't have the option of intellect, unless we are
talking about intellect which does involve biological.
 Inorganic is not biological, but biological does
involve inorganic.  This is all I gather, so far.

[Krimel]
Have betterness as your central thought is problematic. It leaves open the
question of worseness. In theological circle similar arguments cause similar
problems. The existence of evil has been used often as a proof for the
non-existence of God. The devout offer up all kinds of theodicies to
discount this critique but frankly they are all pretty lame. You are seeing
basically the same thing here.