[MD] Social Darwinism

[Dan Glover]

>From: MarshaV <marshalz at charter.net>
>Reply-To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>Subject: Re: [MD] Social Darwinism
>Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 14:18:53 -0400
>
>
>I have gone so far as to state that Quality is amoral.  Both Platt
>and Arlo immediately started throwing quotes at me.   I presented the
>water analogy:  If everything is water, and there is nothing that is
>not water, then there is no meaning to water, for there is no way of
>distinguishing a duality or difference between water and
>nonwater.   It seems to me, if there were a morality to the MoQ, it
>would reside in the 3rd and 4th levels.  Do you agree, or not?

Hi Marsha

Everything is water. Would you agree that some water is better than other 
water?

Dan