[MD] Social Darwinism
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Mon May 21 01:08:36 PDT 2007
At 10:19 PM 5/20/2007, you wrote:
> >From: MarshaV <marshalz at charter.net>
> >Reply-To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> >To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> >Subject: Re: [MD] Social Darwinism
> >Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 14:18:53 -0400
> >
> >
> >I have gone so far as to state that Quality is amoral. Both Platt
> >and Arlo immediately started throwing quotes at me. I presented the
> >water analogy: If everything is water, and there is nothing that is
> >not water, then there is no meaning to water, for there is no way of
> >distinguishing a duality or difference between water and
> >nonwater. It seems to me, if there were a morality to the MoQ, it
> >would reside in the 3rd and 4th levels. Do you agree, or not?
>
>Hi Marsha
>
>Everything is water. Would you agree that some water is better than other
>water?
>
>Dan
Dan,
No, I couldn't agree. I am the same as everything else (water). I
am not separate.
Conventionally, I make judgements all the time, but they are
statements of misunderstanding. That's that.
Marsha
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list