[MD] tiny skull

[David Harding]

SA,

Spot on I think. That's why a balance between the two is good.  But  
then what is the right balance?  I think one that is good is the  
right balance. :-)

Cheers,

David.

On 22/05/2007, at 7:56 AM, Heather Perella wrote:

>
>> [David]
>>  Quality can be both defined and not defined and the
>> MOQ defends both
>> positions.
>
>> [Ron]
>> Just had to post this by itself
>
>
>      And this is why on some of my recent posts, I
> think to Platt, I said how this has to do with the
> question mark (?).  You can focus on answering the
> question, but doing that too much has one forget that
> it is still an ever-lasting question.  To focus too
> much on the question mark, and not try to define is to
> collapse all levels and then what - chaos.  Tricky...
>
> woods,
> SA
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> ______________Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship  
> answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/