[MD] Animals and Dynamic Quality

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting ARLO J BENSINGER JR <ajb102 at psu.edu>:

> [Platt]
> Your answers have been mere assertions unsupported by evidence. Anybody can say
> anything. But unless claims can be backed by something, it's just  blowing
> smoke. So give me something to support you claim that shifts in the wind are
> inorganic responses to DQ. Anything.
> 
> [Arlo]
> So give me something to back up your claims, Platt. Back your claim up with
> something. Answer my question. 
> 
> I have made claims, and I have given you evidence. My position is sound and
> coherent. I've answered all these questions. All you keep doing is saying "that
> doesn't count", as if that proves something. 

No. I'm saying you need to support your claims with evidence. Otherwise, 
blowing smoke, signifying nothing. Anybody can say anything, as you so
amply demonstrate. 

> So again, you think I am wrong. You think my evidence "doesn't count".  So
> answer my question and show me the error of my ways. Tell me why my evidence
> "doesn't count" by giving me a substantive reply.

You, an academic, need to be told the difference unsubstantiated claims and
evidence? Boy, that doesn't say much for Penn State. Or is it Penn?

Just give me some evidence -- any evidence -- that shifts
in the wind are responses to DQ. 


 



-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/