[MD] Animals and Dynamic Quality
ARLO J BENSINGER JR
ajb102 at psu.edu
Thu May 24 16:48:27 PDT 2007
[Platt]
Just give me some evidence -- any evidence -- that shifts in the wind are
responses to DQ.
[Arlo]
Evidence, for me, is simply seeing anything respond to "it's better here".
Everytime an atom or a cat or a person responds to that, that is evidence they
are responsive to DQ.
What would constitute evidence, for you, that an animal can respond to DQ? (We
can start another thread about the "wind" if you want to).
I'll assume that whatever constitutes this evidence must be something an animal
in the past that could respond to DQ used to be able to do.
You had said once that "when my cat can stare at its tail in wonder" you'd
believe it can respond to DQ.
So I'm guessing that "staring at its tail in wonder" is evidence that an animal
is responding to DQ. (I'll also assume that you realize that "die" was too
absurd an answer to repeat).
Is that something that an animal that could respond to DQ in the past was able
to do? If not, what would be?
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list