[MD] Animals and Dynamic Quality

[David M]

Hi Dan

Interesting, we await the experiments.

DM

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Glover" <daneglover at hotmail.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 3:14 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Animals and Dynamic Quality


> Hello everyone
>
>>From: "David M" <davidint at blueyonder.co.uk>
>>Reply-To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>>To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
>>Subject: Re: [MD] Animals and Dynamic Quality
>>Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:47:01 +0100
>>
>>Hi Micah
>>
>>Might point would be what could happen is different and
>>has a form of reality that what could not happen does not have.
>>It can rain water, it can't rain cats and dogs. The possible is real
>>and determines where the present can go. The past is merely static
>>the future the source of the dynamic.
>
> Hi David
>
> I found this article to be of interest (you might have to copy and paste 
> it
> into your browser):
>
> http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/mg19125710.900-whats-done-is-done-or-is-it.html
>
> If I read the article correctly, the past is not merely static, nor is the
> future Dynamic. All there is is the present. The present shapes
> (Dynamically) both past and future.
>
> But I could be wrong...
>
> Dan
>
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>