[MD] Animals and Dynamic Quality (Recast)

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting Krimel <Krimel at Krimel.com>:

> > [Craig]
> > It could be both that things that change can be static patterns and also 
> > that all change is the result of responses to DQ.
> > 
> > [Arlo]
> > Thanks for this. As I said, I think "static patterns" or "probability 
> > waves" (in the SODV sense) are the experienced probability patterns of 
> > many, many aggregated responses to DQ, beginning with the "highest" 
> > (in the MOQ hierarchy) and most complex repertoire of possibility as
> > spiraling down in ever-decreasing circles of possibility into the 
> > lowest and simplest responses of inorganic patterns to DQ.
> > 
> > [Platt had said]
> > Cloud formations change because the next formation is better than 
> > the last?
> > Hardly.
> > 
> > [Krimel then replied]
> > Hardly? No, exactly! Well I am not fond of the "better" part but I wanted
> > to applaud the progress in your thinking.
> > 
> > [Arlo]
> > Agree. What we perceive of as a "cloud formation" is a probability wave
> > (again, in the SODV sense) emanating from the aggregate responses 
> > (to DQ) of the many smaller inorganic patterns of which it is 
> > constructed (themselves "probability waves" emanating from the 
> > aggregate responses (to DQ) of the smaller patterns of which they are
> > constructed).
> > 
> > So it is perfectly appropriate to say that cloud formations change 
> > because it is (pardoning the use of the term) "better" for them to do so.
> > Indeed, it is just such a statement the MOQ encourages us to make.
> > Consider the cloud as a "static, inorganic probability wave". The 
> > changes we "experience" are the result of fluxuations in the aggregate 
> > responses to DQ from which this probability wave actualizes. 
> 
> [Platt]
> A highly abstract rationalization, but I don't see where changing cloud
> formations, hair styles or one's underwear is a response to the creative
> Dynamic forces of evolution.
> 
> [Krimel]
> You don't see it because you are missing the fundamental nature of DQ and
> change.

I doubt it. 




-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/