[MD] Perception,evolution and the spirit

[David M]

Ron

I meant ZMM of course. But if you fancy a change try Bishop Berkeley
or Whitehead's Process & Reality for explanation of why the subject 
object language is optional and questionable.

DM


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Kulp" <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Perception,evolution and the spirit


> 
> 
> Ron said:
>> Subject/object perception can not be "dropped" like a unstylish hand 
>> bag.
>> Anyone who thinks they do not percieve in terms of subjects and 
>> objects is fooling themselves.
> 
> 
> I know a good book you should read.
> 
> DM
> 
> 
> [Ron]
> Do tell, I could use a good read. Thanks!
> 
> 
> 
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>