[MD] The Oriental intellect(ual) level

[Heather Perella]

Comment below:


     [Khoo Hock Aun]
> Excuse me my intervention at this point - but arent
> we going MOQ-centric
> about the whole thing. The whole universe and the
> whole damn thing is not
> just about the MOQ and how the various levels
> explain its workings !
> Bo I dare say you have latched on to the centricity
> of the MOQ in the
> absence of dynamic appreciation and try try as much
> as you do to explain
> everything else in its terms. The Upanishads were a
> time on to themselves,
> so were the Mayans and the aboriginals of Australia.
>  What irks me is the
> attempt to place a classification of intellectualism
> on a whole philosophy !
> Arrogance ?  I dare think so.

    Exactly!!!!!  What was Bo thinking here?  I
totally agree with you Khoo Hock Aun!


    [Khoo Hock Aun] 
> As far as causality, who are we to say that Greek
> philosophy is traced from
> Indian Philosophy or vice versa.

     Again - Exactly!!

     [Khoo Hock Aun]
> If your worldview is static and that time
> is a straight line then maybe. But picture this -
> that pockets of
> enlightened consciousness emerge across time and
> space inter-related and
> inter -causal all at the same time, neither one
> instance responsible for the
> other - but happening at the same time and not
> happening at all.



     AWESOME!!!!!!  EXCELLENT!!!


     [Khoo Hock Aun]
> >From the Eastern/Oriental worldview, Western/Greek
> philosophy is only one
> variant of a worldview localised by time and space,


    Yes!  These are variants of one "worldview".  


     [Khoo Hock Aun]
> not to be pinned down to
> a sub-section of a sub-section as Aristotle was wont
> to do. It could be
> called by any other name - and it would not make an
> iota of a difference.
> But you western oriented gentlemen (wogs) all - by
> these I dont mean race
> nor religion - but by philosophical underpinning -
> the urge to divide and
> classify - is just too strong is it not ?

     Understand Bo has stopped the wheel from turning,
and forces the intellectual level is be stuck as
either a subject or an object.  He is tyrannical in
his approach to define the intellectual level once and
for all with no freedom of others to have a say.  He
says it is SOM, and says that's that.  It is
interesting to see where dogma comes from and how it
seems to blindly disregard certain perspectives from
time to time.  I'm glad somebody else saw what I saw
here coming from Bo.  




straight-forwardly the wind does blow leaves,
SA

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com