[MD] The Oriental intellect(ual) level
Heather Perella
spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 12 14:17:22 PST 2007
[SA previously]
> > Exactly!!!!! What was Bo thinking here? I
> > totally agree with you Khoo Hock Aun!
[Bo]
> I may seem rude, but what is this site coming to if
> we don't
> discuss everything and anything in relationship
> to/with the MOQ?
> For a long while it looked like a competition in how
> many posts
> could be written without mentioning Pirsig's ideas,
> and I couldn't
> stand this happening and joined again. OK I know I
> sound
> "righteous", still ...
1 - Rudeness! I'm sarcastic at times, and I'm
sure this is rude to some, and Mazu physically hit his
students into enlightenment, anyways... It was how
you 'tried' to argue your point. You didn't argue.
You just said "Upanishads philosophy" was
"irrelevant". That's really not delving into any
intellectual patterns, other than the quick, it's not
valuable to Bo so get this "irrelevant" stuff out of
here. Why is it not relevant would have helped.
2- You didn't discuss it, so, how can we discuss
"anything and everything".
3 - I use Pirsig's ideas quite often I believe.
That's the point. Many of us believe we are using
Pirsig's ideas, and for you to think you have sole
authority as to what Pirsig's ideas are seems a bit
tyrannical. Did you notice the quote in Lila I
posted, in which Pirsig discusses Upanishads
philosophy and other pertinent India philosophy and
such?
woods are darkening,
SA
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list