[MD] subject/object: pragmatism

[MarshaV]

Greetings,

Bo, I have great empathy with your mission.  I too sometimes try to 
find the right words.  But I cannot imagine a success.  The MOQ that 
RMP has given us is one of words and a couple of diagrams.  No matter 
how brilliant those words and diagrams, I think they are a mixture of 
intellect and art and not his DQ/sq experience.

The problem I have is that I cannot imagine dynamic quality contained 
in a level.  I believe this is how RMP, in fact, states it.  If you 
put the static/dynamic split in a level, what would you have.  You'd 
have only static quality.  Dynamic quality would dissolve.  It's 
would not be there.  It is nothing, empty, un-manifested experience, 
beyond definition, explanation and symbols.  To my way of thinking, 
such a level would collapse.

I feel all the words that RMP has written are but a high value 
intellectual map pointing to an experience of something beyond 
itself.  Being intellectual in no way diminishes such a feat or the 
Metaphysics of Quality.

You are a painter, so I'm sure aware of such DQ/sq 
experiences.  Haven't you found that attempts to describe the 
experience fall short of the task?  My attempts seem to quickly fall 
into the category of absurd babble.  Your arguments to distinguish 
and create a higher static/dynamic level (view), above the 
Intellectual Level, have not convinced me.  Although I understand and 
appreciate why you would want to try.

Marsha