[MD] subject/object: pragmatism

[Heather Perella]

     [SA previously]
> > Ok, the moq isn't the intellectual level according
> to you?  


     [Bo] 
> Not AT the intellectual level, i.e: no intellectual
> pattern, is my claim .. .. to pick nits...
> ...I did answer that. The big deal is that the MOQ
is a
> "big deal" and because the levels are sub-sets of
the MOQ, the MOQ
> can by no twist of logic be a sub-set (pattern) of a
level.
> The MOQ is no static level, it is the very QUALITY
SYSTEM. (Phew,
> everything you say can be used against you)   



     Bo, if I finally have figured out what your
saying, then blow me down!  When you say 'moq' could I
instead say 'quality' or 'dynamic quality'?  I'll wait
for your answer before I conclude if I have finally
reached the point where I understand you. 


     [SA previously]
> > Is it pure experience/direct experience? 

     [Bo] 
> Of course. We know from ZAMM that Phaedrus reached
> the 
> insight that some pure - direct - experience
> preceded (what he 
> called)  "intellect" (much like Poincare's "beauty"
> and James' 
> "aesthetic continuum") this was what later became
> Dynamic 
> Quality so DQ=pure experience=direct experience.


     This makes sense.



gray squirrels have white stomachs,
snow lays and is white,
my son's teeth push(ing) through and they are white,
     - more white this moment! 


SA


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better sports nut!  Let your teams follow you 
with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ