[MD] Does Quality really exist?
Redsky235 at aol.com
Redsky235 at aol.com
Thu Nov 29 13:01:37 PST 2007
But you're still only removing the distinctions between the wall and the
picture, and not any inherent "quality." Is it well built/Does it have good
foundation? Well, that's purely subjective. We "know" what Quality is?
Someone out there prefers the blank wall. Someone prefers PIL to Beethoven. Is
there a definitive answer to someone who's wondering if PIL or Beethoven has
more Quality? You can remove the notes, making them sound the same to the
observers, but would that be Quality?
In a message dated 11/29/2007 12:58:29 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
moq_discuss-request at lists.moqtalk.org writes:
Pirsig's point is that even the blank wall has it's quality
Is it well built?
Is it level and square?
Does it have good foundation?
And so on.
So even the blank wall has its quality. In fact because it's a simpler
form, it's quality would be more universal than a piece of art whose
quality hinges on culture, space and time.
Khaled
**************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest
products.
(http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list