[MD] Mereological nihilism

[MarshaV]

Greetings Ham,

Your objection to the MOQ is its lack of 'primary source' and 
'purpose'.  It seems to me that these two concepts are built on ideas 
within the evolution and limitations of human knowledge.  What proof 
or experience can you offer for these concepts?  In using the word 
'primary', you are stating something specific.  This adjective leads 
me to ask why the source couldn't be the third or ninth in series of 
processes?  And the word purpose would imply intention, what can you 
tell me about this intention and the desired results?  I have asked 
these question before, but you have not given a response.  Yet you 
trot out the word 'nihilism' to point out their absence?  It seems to 
me nothing is absent.

I ask you again: What can you tell me about this ''primary' source' 
and 'purpose', and how do you know?

Marsha