[MD] "100% confident"

[Heather Perella]

     [SA previously]
>      Do you think Ham has a different philosophy? 
> Different from what is called the moq?

     [Ron]
> I feel Ham has come to a very similar point but by a
> differing path,


     What is this "similar point"?

     [Ron]
> I also feel that while
> he focuses on the individuals relationship with
> source Pirsig focuses on
> empirical explaination
> and practicle employment in regard to scientific
> inquirey.


     Do you really think the moq is solely focused on
"scientific inquiry"?  And what does that mean?


     [Ron]
> I think we have the age old
> classic/romantic split of a single concept,

    Haven't we settled upon static/dynamic as the
first split of quality?  If we haven't, then that's
fine.  I have though.  I would say this is a real
example of where absolutes fade away.  What is the
Dao?



    [Ron]
> I'd like to work it out and
> see if this is the case.
> who knows, it could lead to something bigger than
> both. Throw in Bo's
> SOL and one would have
> a metaphysical swiss army knife with MOQ as it's
> hub.

     Go for it.


SA





      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7