[MD] "100% confident"

[David M]

dmb replies:
That simply doesn't make sense. How can "sensibility" be counted as 
something other than an experience?

Hi DMB

What an odd blind spot you have about how language works. Ham is entitled to 
make a distinction any way he
likes. A good dose of Rorty would help you here. Ham says he calls what we 
sense prior to conceptualisation
a sensation and what we conceptualise experience-proper. I assume he has his 
reasons for doing this. You and
I may decide it does not work for us, it has no use, we can make better 
sense of our sensations and experiences
with different language but it is easy to understand the distinction, it 
might have its uses. It is up to Ham to show what
that use is. If we are gonna walk the MOQ walk we need to use lines of 
argument and justification that don't
contradict our MOQ take on language. That's my view. You damage debate with 
these lapses.

David M