[MD] "100% confident"

[ian glendinning]

Hi SA,

I think Ham believes humour is a sign of not taking philosophy seriously.

(Whereas there is a long tradition of humour in philosophy and
philosophy in humour.)

Ian

On 10/24/07, Heather Perella <spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com> wrote:
>     [Ham]
> > (I would have done the same for SA but,
> > unfortunately, he has suddenly become antagonistic
> > and no longer wishes to
> > associate himself with my philosophy.)
>
>
>     I don't call it antagonistic.  I call it a
> comedy.  Like when Abbot and Costello can't understand
> what their saying in the "Who's on First?" skit.  This
> is why I laugh.  It's not a negative laugh, but a
> comedy where misunderstandings and unknowings break in
> the tension with a laughter of relief.  This is one
> way I cope in the face of experiences I don't
> understand and that don't make sense to me.
>
> red, yellow, and orange,
> SA
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>