[MD] real/illusion/real
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Thu Sep 20 10:07:35 PDT 2007
[Marsha]
At first all things of the world are real, then all things of the
world are illusion, then once again all things of the world are real.
[Arlo]
Hi, Marsha. If I understand correctly, this seems to resonate with
what Ant posted a few days ago.
"An infant tends not to recognise ego boundaries but that is from the
(selfish) point of view that it _is_ the universe. A mystic, also
tends not to recognise ego boundaries but that is from the (selfless)
point of view that the (static) self dissolves in a fundamentally
Dynamic universe. Though on the surface, both points of view seem
similar, there is the 'full circle' of spiritual growth (of the
individual) between them." (Ant McWatt)
I have heard a similar statement (although maybe sounding inverted)
in that the human cycle begins with seeing the world through the
wonderment of the eyes of a child. As we mature, we lose lose this
wonderment in seeking underlying causality and mechanics governing
the world. But a third step, the "Zen" step, is to reach an
integration where wonderment is recaptured. It is this cycle, if
memory serves, that is describe by Benjamin Hoff in the Tao of
Pooh/Te of Piglet books. Here we move from illusion to real back to
illusion. Or maybe from illusion-based-in-ignorance to
real-based-in-knowledge to illusion-based-in-philosophy.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list