[MD] subject/object: no quality?

[MarshaV]

At 03:18 PM 9/20/2007, Ham wrote:

>[Ham, previously]:
> > Value cannot be primary unless your concept of ultimate reality is
> > differentiated existence, subjectively realized.  I assume from your
> > "special definition" that you exclude the possibility of a metaphysical
> > reality.
>
>[Marsha]:
> > If by 'metaphysical reality' do you mean theology?
> > Then yes I do exclude it.
>
>Theology is a word most people associate with a Supreme Being.  Have I ever
>defined Essence as a Being?  That's a red herring, Marsha, and I'm sure you
>know it.  One can valuistically call what is absolute "supreme", but this
>relational description has no metaphysical significance.

Greetings Ham,

Much of this post is beyond my ability to unpack its essence, so I 
pulled out an obvious question.  It seems I misinterpreted your 
meaning, so I'll let you explain.  What is this 'metaphysical 
reality', you think is being excluded?

Curiously,
     Marsha