[MD] subject / object logic

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting Heather Perella <spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com>:

>      [SA previously]
> > >      No absolute truth is the same as saying No
> > > absolute eggs. 
> 
>      [Platt] 
> > Not the same. To say there is no absolute truth is
> > to assert a truth. Thus, contradictory. 
> 
> 
>      Of course it's not the same.  I mean 1x0=0, and
> 2x0=0.  For both of these equations to be exactly 0. 
> The first zero is definitely, yeah definitely, yeah um
> definitely not the same as the second zero.  hahaha

Glad you agree that it's not the same. 

>      [SA previously]
> > > With no absolute '-----' anything can
> > > be in the blank, and make complete sense, due to
> > one is saying there are no absolutes, which means -
> > > nothing, zero when it comes to what an absolute
> > is.  This is what "truth is not an absolute" means. 
> It
> > is a big fat zero.  Now, do you know what zero is?
> 
>      [Platt] 
> > Sorry. I don't follow you. Are you saying zero means
> > nothing? Pirsig disagrees:
> > "Zero" and "space" are complex relationships of
> > "somethingness."  (Lila, 5)
> 
>      Wow!  Zero and space are the same, na definitely,
> na, definitely not correct, I mean if zero, and no
> birds flying across the sky means I don't see any
> birds, then surely birds are flying as non-birds
> flying across the sky.  hahaha
> 
> hilarious!!

Yes. Nonsensical. 

Platt 





-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/