[MD] subject / object logic

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting Heather Perella <spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com>:

>      [SA previously]
> > >     So why are you against something that's not
> > real?  Isn't that like trying to hit a tree in a
> field
> > that has no trees?
> 
>      [Platt] 
> > I'm not against something that's not real. I'm
> > against calling what's real an illusion.
> 
> 
>      So, instead of saying Buddhism is not interested
> in "this world", as you put it, then maybe you could
> define how Buddhism is real instead of an illusion. 
> Maybe?
 
I'm sure Buddhism is real to its practitioners just as Mohamed is real to Muslims.

-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/