[MD] subject / object logic

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting Heather Perella <spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com>:

> 
> > >      [SA had said]
> > > > >     So why are you against something that's
> > not
> > > > real?  Isn't that like trying to hit a tree in a
> > > field
> > > > that has no trees?
> > > 
> > >      [Platt had responded] 
> > > > I'm not against something that's not real. I'm
> > > > against calling what's real an illusion.
> > > 
> > > 
> > >      So, instead of saying Buddhism is not
> > interested
> > > in "this world", as you put it, then maybe you
> > could
> > > define how Buddhism is real instead of an
> > illusion. 
> > > Maybe?
> 
>      [Platt]  
> > I'm sure Buddhism is real to its practitioners just
> > as Mohamed is real to Muslims.
> 
> 
>      What does this mean?  Is everything real?
 
No. Does my answer say everything is real?


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/