[MD] Value and the Individual

[Krimel]

> [Krimel]
> Cosmic purpose?  This is an absurd notion.
> If I were to grant you that such a thing exists,
> please, I am seriously begging you, to tell me what
> it is and how I would recognize it if I saw it.

[Ham]
You "see it" continuously, yet you don't recognize it.  Your intellect gets 
in the way.  It binds you to the precept that any theory which cannot be 
confirmed empirically is false.  In other words, you have succumbed to the 
collectivist view that one can ascribe "purpose and intention" to the 
universe but not to the self for which it was created.

How sad.

[Krimel]
What in the heck are you talking about? I see it but don't recognize it? But
you see it and do? So why can't you just tell me what it is so I can look
harder? If you and I, at least theoretically, can see it; how is it not
empirical?

What in the world does this have to do with a collectivist view? I think you
have me confused with someone else. I do not think the cosmos has a purpose
but I most assuredly think that I do.

Why do you refuse to answer my other questions?