[MD] Individual=subjective?

[MarshaV]

At 01:09 PM 4/7/2008, you wrote:
>Greetings Marsha --
>
> > I can't speak for the MOQ either, but individuals exist
> > as ever-changing collections of overlapping, interrelated,
> > inorganic, biological, social and intellectual, static patterns
> > of value.  (Not subjects and objects.)  And that seems no
> > less precious and profound.
> >
> > It seems important to add something to my sentence in my
> > last post so make that 'precious, profound and also ordinary,'
>
>Your concept of the individual appears to be that of the MOQ.
>Now that you've confirmed that explanation, I'll follow your example and
>amend my previous comment as follows:
>
> > We cannot prove that subjectivity exists.  Which is why, for the radical
> > empiricists and MOQ hierarchians, it must be explained away as a myth.
>
>Regards,
>Ham

Greetings Ham,

Myth?  You who insist on a Primary Source and Purpose?  Come on...

Marsha








Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...