[MD] Dynamic Development at all costs?
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Tue Apr 15 10:52:43 PDT 2008
[Chris to Khaled]
As for the answer I don't know, but I do believe balance is the key.
[Arlo]
As do I. What you see often here from some is the classic "Good v.
Evil" battle continually recast, sometimes over the
"individual/collective" question, and here over the DQ/SQ question.
That is we are told that DQ is "freedom and glory and goodness" while
SQ is "stifling evil and suffocation and the cause of all suffering".
DQ becomes, as you suggest, simply another word for "God", and SQ
becomes of course "Satan".
I don't think Pirsig sees it this way. I think DQ and SQ are cast
together like the eternal Yin-Yang, inseparable, mutally dependent.
Pirsig himself says as much. "Without Dynamic Quality the organism
cannot grow. Without static quality the organism cannot last. Both
are needed." (LILA)
The goal would seem to be to create a system that while open to the
greatest amount of DQ possible, the system reflects the static
latching needed in order to sustain the Good things so achieved.
There is also a myth here that the "free market" was on the verge of
creating a veritable Utopia when big, bad guvermint came in an ruined
things. There is a reason why there was a social mandate to reign in
the "free market", and that was the low quality of life experienced
by the great majority following the "unregulated success" of the turn
of the century. The market had created enormous wealth for Carnegies
and Pullmans and the barons of industry, but the Chicago River was
turned into a festering swamp of coagulated blood and rotting flesh.
Miner's wives saw their husband's bodies dumped by the door of their
shack and told to move out. Children were working 16 hour days in
dangerous jobs, and earning less each week than the cost of a loaf of
bread. Even moving into the 20the century, business dumped toxic
chemicals without concern for any local populations, and when they
were indicted here they simply began dumping their toxic chemicals
wantonly across the border. In West Virginia, a mining company
knowingly sent miners into silica-laden mines without the proper
protection (too costly), and reaped huge profits while the miners
choked to death on their own blood. Prior to public education, poor
children had no chance of ever going to a school, education was
reserved for the wealthy.
It was these conditions that moved people to demand regulation, it
was not imposed by some evil outside agency, it was demanded by the
people after witnessing the realities of an "unregulated market".
Wage laws, child labor laws, workplace safety laws, pollution
regulations, disposal regulations, all these were the result of
people coming together and saying that our vision must be on greater
concerns than simply "wealth production". But they did not do away
with the "free market", they did not abolish private enterprise and
entrepreneurship, rather they moved towards balance, and it is that
balance which has led to the material quality of life in the West.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list