[MD] Dynamic Development at all costs?
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Tue Apr 15 11:15:55 PDT 2008
[Platt to Chris]
If you find it less than satisfactory, you are
probably of a mind that considers the average
individual too stupid to know what's good, or at
least that you know better what's good than she does.
[Arlo]
In ZMM, the same book you draw your quote from,
Pirsig talks about the cultural blindedness of a
people conditioned not to see Quality.
"The result is rather typical of modern
technology, an overall dullness of appearance so
depressing that it must be overlaid with a veneer
of "style" to make it acceptable. And that, to
anyone who is sensitive to romantic Quality, just
makes it all the worse. Now it's not just
depressingly dull, it's also phony. Put the two
together and you get a pretty accurate basic
description of modern American technology:
stylized cars and stylized outboard motors and
stylized typewriters and stylized clothes.
Stylized refrigerators filled with stylized food
in stylized kitchens in stylized houses. Plastic
stylized toys for stylized children, who at
Christmas and birthdays are in style with their
stylish parents. You have to be awfully stylish
yourself not to get sick of it once in a while.
It's the style that gets you; technological
ugliness syruped over with romantic phoniness in
an effort to produce beauty and profit by people
who, though stylish, don't know where to start
because no one has ever told them there's such a
thing as Quality in this world and it's real, not style." (ZMM)
He continues, "Along the streets that lead away
from the apartment he can never see anything
through the concrete and brick and neon but he
knows that buried within it are grotesque,
twisted souls forever trying the manners that
will convince themselves they possess Quality,
learning strange poses of style and glamour
vended by dream magazines and other mass media,
and paid for by the vendors of substance." (ZMM)
Thus Pirsig felt that the problems in the West
could only be solved by a "Quality"
Enlightenment, a metaphysical revolution that
would open the eyes of the masses to see Quality.
Are we beyond that point? Are the masses now
seeing Quality? Near the end of ZMM, Pirsig
comments, "I know what it is! We've arrived at
the West Coast! We're all strangers again! Folks,
I just forgot the biggest gumption trap of all.
The funeral procession! The one everybody's in,
this hyped-up, fuck-you, supermodern, ego style
of life that thinks it owns this country. We've
been out of it for so long I'd forgotten all about it." (ZMM)
Are we still in that gumption trap? Are we
"grooving it"? ""Getting with it," "digging it,"
"grooving on it" are all slang reflections of
this identity. It is this identity that is the
basis of craftsmanship in all the technical arts.
And it is this identity that modern,
dualistically conceived technology lacks. The
creator of it feels no particular sense of
identity with it. The owner of it feels no
particular sense of identity with it. The user of
it feels no particular sense of identity with it.
Hence, by Phædrus' definition, it has no Quality." (ZMM)
What changes in production and consumption have
occurred since ZMM's time? Are our products today
built in shops where identity is fostered? Do our
modern factories no longer divide "art" from
"manufacture"? "The ancient Greeks never
separated art from manufacture in their minds,
and so never developed separate words for them." (ZMM)
In short, have we overcome Pirsig's
acknowledgement that, "The real ugliness lies in
the relationship between the people who produce
the technology and the things they produce, which
results in a similar relationship between the
people who use the technology and the things they use." (ZMM).
Because I would imagine when we, as a people,
achieve this Quality Enlightenment, our world
will be drastically different. And the so-called
"evil" social programs the people have enacted to
stave off the ills of an unregulated market based
on an SOM Weltanschauung, will likely no longer be needed.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list