[MD] Dynamic Development at all costs?
Christoffer Ivarsson
IvarssonChristoffer at hotmail.com
Sat Apr 19 02:40:48 PDT 2008
>> >> Hey, Arlo, Krimel and all you others.
>> >>
>> >> You know what the real funny thing about this is? When Platt and his
>> >> lot
>> >> strikes down on those who have it worst, they do so by saying that
>> >> it's
>> >> because they are slackers or whatever that they are in the position
>> >> they
>> >> are in. And then, when you find examples of how these peoples have
>> >> gone
>> >> together in a political struggle to make sure that their children
>> >> don't
>> >> have to starve to death - why, then they are hindering Dynamic
>> >> Quality!
>> >> Well, isn't it Dynamic Quality at work when this kind of thing
>> >> happens?
>> >> Humans experience that their life is one of Low Quality, and they set
>> >> out
>> >> to change it. Dynamically.
>> >
>> > Ganging up to take away the property and freedom of others by force? I
>> > don't think so.
>>
>> no. not by force. By the means of democracy. the best known example to me
>> is
>> the development of The Swedish Social Democratic Party.
>
> Chris:
> All governments have a monopoly on the lawful use of force and accomplish
> their ends by coercion.
>
> Regards,
> Platt
- Large amount of people are treated badly in their work environment.
- Large amount of people get together and for a political party.
- Political party gets many votes and gains large influence over politics.
-Large party of large amounts of people who are treated bad in their work
environment uses their political influence to write law that says that 20
hours work day is not OK.
What happened?
People saw Low Quality and decided to try to move towards High Quality.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list