[MD] Science and the MOQ

David M davidint at blueyonder.co.uk
Sat Apr 19 12:20:42 PDT 2008


Krim:> I am not saying that we can avoid making assumptions. I'm saying we 
should
> avoid making stupid assumptions.

DM: Great, except how do we really spot these?

When we ask others to make assumptions with
> us we should be prepared to explain why.

DM: Exactly what I am asking you to do.

The conscious germ and electron
> assumptions offer nothing in the way of explanatory power. All I can see
> that they do is offer a bogus sense of identity. Rather like, "If I were 
> an
> electron I know that I would prefer this state to that state and I would
> want to do thus and so." Now if there is some serious advantage to this 
> line
> of thinking, great. But Platt has certainly not been forthcoming with it. 
> I
> can tell you are sympathetic but really have not shown me much either.
> The question is not whether we make assumptions, it is about what kind of
> assumption we make and why.

DM: Sure, I agree. I really get this from Whitehead where he suggest
that dropping the assumptions of an inanimate realm helps us to
see the non-dualistic nature of life and its development of inorganic
capacities that eventually gives us consciousness as incremental
and as likely to have some lower level aspect in inorganic processes.





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list