[MD] Dynamic Development at all costs?

[Christoffer Ivarsson]

>> [Platt]
>> > In the U.S., liberals are socialists. And I gather your comparing me to
>> > Louis
>> > XVI was intended as a compliment rather than an insult. Right?
>>
>> No they are not. Just because you call them that doesn't make them
>> socialists. Just because I call a tree a car it doesn't make it so. And
>> comparing your views to Louie XVI was to illustrate how obsolete your
>> politics are.
>
> Believe as you wish.

I can do that. But If I want to function in society I have to use 
approximately the same definitions as the majority of the people. Hence I 
call socialists socialists, communists communists, and liberals liberals. 
Liberals are in the centre of the political scale, and US conservatives (don't 
have that kind here) is so far to the right they fall just short of reaching 
the brown parties.