[MD] What is the MOQ?

[MarshaV]

At 09:43 AM 4/22/2008, you wrote:



>Marsha, and Everyone I think
>
>I Think I get what Bo means by this:  To a SOMist everything is subject and
>object. To a MOQist everything is Quality. If you ask both of them: "but
>hey, where did Objects/Quality come from?" both of them will answer that 'it
>was always there', perhaps adding: 'waiting to be recognized by us humans.'
>
>That, and a religious understanding of things isn't part of a system, it is
>what makes a system possible.
>
>But I will ask Bo this then, how does the MOQ and the SOM differ?
>
>In fact, I will ask all of you that.


Hi Chris,

Are you asking what is the difference between monism and dualism?

Marsha




> >>I don't quite get your point, the fact that reality's (=Quality's)
> >>dynamic component is part of the MOQ can't by no twist of logic
> >>be a "definition" and thus an desecration.  I used the example of
> >>religions that postulate a God/World split, but God is still as
> >>sacred. Yet, it struck me just now, this may have wider
> >>ramifications. The pious thinks that God is from before "religion",
> >>is it the same piety that surfaces as a demand about a Quality
> >>from before the MOQ?
>
> >>Bo
> >
> > Greetings Bo,
> >
> > My point is that to put DQ in a box, or metalevel, is a definition
> > (maybe visual) of containment.
> >
> > When you talk about god, I haven't any idea what you are talking about.
> >
> > Marsha
>
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/



Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...