[MD] Dynamic Development at all costs?

[Christoffer Ivarsson]

> [Chris]
> Don't know, but I will say amen to that last part wholeheartedly.  And 
> Arlo
> is completeley right aswell. It is intellectualy painfull sometimes to 
> meet
> with this "radio-talk"  - I just have to hope that people around here
> recognizes it for what it is.  I think they do.
>
> [Krimel]
> A side note on the issue of fair and balanced. Just because there are
> differing opinions does not mean they deserve equal time. If we are 
> studying
> race relations for example how much time should be spent on skinheads? If 
> we
> are studying astronomy how much time should be devoted to the Ptolemaic
> system? If we are studying biology how much time should be spent on
> creationism? Certainly we would want to spend some time on oddball views 
> and
> historic oddities but giving them equal time is a bit like saying we 
> should
> break out the scales and weight gold against bullshit. We might have equal
> weight but no amount of thumbing scales will produce equal value.

Right. What needs to be done is a Quality assessment. And it is done. So, 
sure, all cards need to be there to be viewed (when we talk about education 
and what is presented) but as you say, some of them just have enough Quality 
to be worth wasting too much time and energy on.

Regards

Chris