[MD] WHY MoQ IS PARALYzED

Heather Perella spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com
Mon Apr 28 13:23:33 PDT 2008


> Ron:
> Yes sir, what I was trying to stress was how
> languages treat nouns. 

SA:  Thank you Ron for explaining this to me.  That's
what I was looking for when I addressed this to Arlo. 
I was beginning to wonder if this thought was dying
out or what.
        If a chair, a noun, can be abstract and
concrete, what does this mean?  I would say happiness,
though more abstract than concrete, is still concrete
in how we may express happiness or find happiness is
the clear intent or not, for instance, a smile or
frown, concrete traits of happiness, or war, more
anger than happiness.  I like your explanations Ron,
and I'm beginning to agree with you for I can't find
reason not to.  I'm curious about the question I offer
and the comment.  How would you put these into your
line of thinking?


SA 


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list