[MD] WHY MoQ IS PARALYzED

[Ron Kulp]

> Joe (It is Joe, also, correct?):
> > I have difficulty with the word ³abstract² used
> for
> > DQ!
> 
> SA previously:  Yes, I don't agree with this detail
of what Ron
> said either for if we're talking about abstract
> thoughts/intellect, well, that's an intellectual
> pattern.  When it comes to labeling dynamic quality
> in any way that is taboo.

Ron:
This is the whole argument in a nutshell right here
"labeling dynamic quality in any way that is taboo."
Is a fallacy. 

There I said it! And I stand by it.

Dynamic Quality is meant to operate
As an abstract descriptor. We can describe a dynamic
Experience but we can not define Quality absolutely
As a noun because it holds dual meaning, and of
Course the real Quality is experience itself.

I think if we can agree on this point we can start
Discussing things in an MoQ. Context!

This eliminates the need for Bo's SOL.

Occam never had a closer shave.