[MD] WHY MoQ IS PARALYzED
Heather Perella
spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com
Wed Apr 30 12:10:34 PDT 2008
> > Ron previously:
> > This is the whole argument in a nutshell right
> here "labeling dynamic quality in any way that is
> taboo." Is a fallacy.
> > There I said it! And I stand by it.
> SA previously: No wonder some people find the kind
of
> description of dq, that I said and you quoted above
> so
> threatening and misgiving. It seems to be the pivot
> point of where people can't understand each other
> here
> on this forum. I'll think about this. Maybe I'll
> find out why I took the undefined=dynamic and
> defined=static approach in the first place. I'll
> keep
> reading ahead in the posts, and then look into Lila
> as
> to what may have encouraged my approach.
> By the way, this really doesn't have
> anything
> to do with this discussion, so, I don't want to
> throw
> this off track, but I do find Occam overrated and
> thrown around by too many people to justify
> philosophies that can be very, very far apart in
> meaning. Just a side note.
>
> Ron:
> I understand, I threw it in for those who keep his
> razor in their
> cabinet.
> Not like I really use it to decide what ideas are
> worthy enough to be
> Taken seriously on a practical basis, personally.
> You know your really
> not
> That far off with the defined/undefined view.
> Happiness is hard to pin
> down
> In terms, it's vague, chair isn't so hard, it's real
> easy to describe
> and verify, So in
> Some ways you are already with what I'm saying,
SA: In your previous comment above, you said that the
labeling of dq as a taboo is a fallacy. But now your
saying as follows:
Ron:
> ...perhaps a slight
> alteration
> Of conceptual understanding of the function that
> DQ/SQ view can provide
> For better clarity of ordinary terms.
SA: What slight alteration? Mine, yours, or ours in
the forum open for general discussion?
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list