[MD] Reet and the Weakest Link

[Ron Kulp]

Dmb,

If only I could explain in a coherent (Hi Squonk!) manner.  It has
something 
to do with non-affirming negatives, but I don't have it clearly.  Maybe
Ron 
can explain.  If he does, I'd like to know why he so rejected by
question 
about opposite-from-non-beer.  All of a sudden he's a tetralemma
whiz-kid. 
That's okay.  I'll take help from whoever can offer it.  I am so beyond
my 
knowledge base it's frightening.  Movement, even at a snail's pace, is
okay 
with me.

Marsha

Marsha,
I am changing and evolving too, I have learned a great deal since
the " non-beer" argument. But, if I remember correctly you
were caught up in a dualistic dilemma at the time. I said
that things are relational and are defined just as much
by what it is not as by the definition of what it is.
I abandoned it because my explanation was going into
infinite reduction by explanation. I was never going
to explain it on the course we were taking in a manner
in which you would understand given where your head was
at the time.
How the heck do you explain this stuff without a relational
understanding to refer to ?

My abilities were less able than they are now, and even
THAT is relational conditional and dependant.
So what the heck do I know? I can only increase my
relationships and develop my understanding through them.

All I can say accurately is that this is what the tetralemma
means to me via the logical relationships of understanding
I have developed thus far.


-Ron




 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/