[MD] Reet and the Weakest Link

[Ham Priday]

Ron:

> ...I would note the type of dichotomy so as to not confuse
> your subscribers, which was my main point, once you start
> down a path of analytic propositions you are kinda
> committed to it and if you start making synthetic
> statements from analytical ones, some may use this as an
> excuse to render the whole concept as null and void.
> Crucifying you with your own analytical statements.

Thanks for the tip, Ron, although since many already consider the whole 
concept null and void, I doubt that changing an analytic "dichotomy" to a 
synthetic "complementarity" will matter much.  I would prefer that they 
understood the concept on its own merits rather than judge it on logical 
grounds.

I have learned from our exchanges, too, Ron.  As an authority on logic, 
perhaps you can help me with my Creation Hypothesis.  The problem here is my 
use of a "negated agent" which defies traditional logic.  Are you familiar 
with Cusa's principle of the "not-other"?  If you're willing to tackle this 
challenge, I'm your humble student.

Kindest regards,
Ham