[MD] The tetra lemma

Ian Glendinning ian.glendinning at gmail.com
Thu Aug 7 05:07:57 PDT 2008


DMB,
... great writing like ... Marsha too
"You not recognizing it (at this point), doesn't mean that logic isn't there."

The logic you're looking for is simply not "logic as we know it".

Ian

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:42 AM, MarshaV <marshalz at charter.net> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "david buchanan" <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com>
> To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 2:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [MD] The tetra lemma
>
>
>
> Marsha said:
> ...While I wouldn't want you to leave the MOQ & American Pragmatists track,
> I  hope you'll keep Buddhism in mind for another decade.  The MOQ being a
> synthesis of East and West, Buddhism has something very valuable to consider
> too.
>
> dmb says:
> No doubt. "Zen" is in the title and Northrop's East-West fusion is Pirsig's
> main inspiration. Scholars from the East find sanity in William James and
> I've been reading Western translators like Alan Watts since before I was
> born. Its not Buddhism that baffles in general but the tetralemma's
> math-like structure never worked for me. Seems like an overly complicated
> way to say a simple thing. Still don't see anything I'd recognize as logic
> in it.
>
> Marsha:
> You not recognizing it (at this point), doesn't mean that logic isn't there.
>
>
>
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "david buchanan"
>> To:
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:09 PM
>> Subject: Re: [MD] The tetra lemma
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Marsha.
>>
>> I found this section especially helpful. It explains what an essence is
>> and
>> confirms my hunch that such an idea is "obviously false" and "a profound
>> misconception of reality". Apparently, the metaphysics of substance is
>> something even worse than materialism. Its downright crazy. Independent
>> and
>> immutable? Like what?!? Even a materialist will admit that stars are born
>> and die, that mountains wash away, that even the universe has a life span.
>> This nonsense has got to be the vestige of some forgotten religion.
>>
>> Emptiness and Lack of Substance
>> The doctrine of impermanence is intimately related to the doctrine that
>> all
>> things lack inherent substantiality. The Buddhist philosopher Nagarjuna
>> argued that things cannot have separate essences because this would result
>> in an unchanging world: "If there is essence, the whole world will be
>> unarising, unceasing, and static. The entire phenomenal world would be
>> immutable" (FWMW, p. 72). In other words, if something has its own
>> separate
>> essence, then it is entirely separate and without dependence upon anything
>> else for its existence. As a result, it can never be affected or changed.
>> Thus, if things had essences, then the whole world would be immutable and
>> static, which is obviously false. The conclusion is that all things are
>> empty of any such essence. This doctrine of emptiness (sunyata) is
>> fundamental to Mahayana Buddhist philosophy. Similarly, Whitehead states
>> that "it is fundamental to the metaphysical doctrine of the philosophy of
>> organism, that the notion of an actual entity as the unchanging subject of
>> change is completely abandoned" (PR, p. 29). Process philosophy departs
>> from
>> substance philosophy by denying any isolated, individual essence to
>> things.
>> The idea that things have essences is at best a useful abstraction, and at
>> worst a profound misconception of reality: "The simple notion of an
>> enduring
>> substance sustaining persistent qualities, either essentially or
>> accidentally, expresses a useful abstract for many purposes in life. But
>> whenever we try to use it as a fundamental statement of the nature of
>> things, it proves itself mistaken" (PR, p. 79). ...An important instance
>> of
>> this mistake is the Cartesian assumption that the human subject is a
>> fundamental essence prior to human thought....
>>
>> [The whole article is at
>> http://www.integralscience.org/whiteheadbuddhism.html ]
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Got Game? Win Prizes in the Windows Live Hotmail Mobile Summer Games
>> Trivia
>> Contest
>> http://www.gowindowslive.com/summergames?ocid=TXT_TAGHM
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Reveal your inner athlete and share it with friends on Windows Live.
> http://revealyourinnerathlete.windowslive.com?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WLYIA_whichathlete_us
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list