[MD] What is SOM?

[Platt Holden]

> Mr Gavin Gee-Clough! 
> I asked you a question a few days ago, if I have overlooked your 
> reply please direct me to it. The said question was this:
> 
> On 31 July you wrote to Krimel:
> 
> > gav: if you are talking of S and O (as primary; and you are), then
> > we are in SOM. yep that old familiar terrain where objects are
> > objects and subjects are subjects and never the twain shall mingle.
> 
> Agree, but where are we when we are in SOM? That's the  
> #¤&%¤# question. Not in another metaphysical universe, because 
> the MOQ is supposed to have subsumed SOM. At an evil pattern 
> that has hijacked an otherwise neutral intellect, or smack in the
> middle of the 4th. level itself?  
> 
> If anyone else has an opinion, please ...

We think we're in SOM whenever we think. But we're actually in MOQ all the 
time. 

Just my 2 cents worth.

Regards,
Platt