[MD] logic of Essentialism

[Krimel]

[Ham]
I've never heard of a theory being supported by 
the fact that it cannot be validated.  Is that the explosion principle? 
(Try that out on Krimel, DMB, or Matt.)

[Krimel]
There you go taking my name in vain again. If you are looking for an
unsupported theory try: http://www.essentialism.net/mechanic.htm. 

[Ham]
But I still haven't the foggiest idea of what you give creditablilty to as a

belief system.  

[Krimel]
The masterbaiter asks a leading question...

[Ham]
Leaving aside the logic, to what extent, if at all, do you agree with my
ontology?

[Krimel]
He wiggles the bait.

[Ham]
I assume you like that idea, too'

[Krimel]
See the tasty worm? Your might really like it...

[Ham]
Some indication of your affirmation or rejection of this metaphysical
ontogeny would be appreciated at this juncture.  

[Krimel]
It's a lovely worm. Just try a little bite...

[Ham]
What say you, Ron?

[Krimel]
WATCH OUT, RON!!!

There's a hook in there! Swim away, swim away.... and

[Ham]
Essentially yours (I hope), (As he smears a bit of oil in the frying pan.)