[MD] For Bo

[Heather Perella]

Ian,

     I recently had a question for you, but heard no response.  Don't know if you saw it or not.  I asked you (since your a proponent of a certain middle way) if you value disagreement, or if it goes against your grain?  I know you like to say stuff like 'dialog long enough and we'll find we all agree', and seem to be against people disagreeing with each other on this forum.  Curious.


SA 


--- On Fri, 8/22/08, Ian Glendinning <ian.glendinning at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Ian Glendinning <ian.glendinning at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [MD] For Bo
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Date: Friday, August 22, 2008, 5:02 AM
> Actually, Ron, SA,
> 
> Godel's argument concerns any formal system of logic
> (not just
> mathematics per se) ... but it doesn't change your
> point, since the
> argument was part of the debate about whether mathematics
> and logic
> resolve to the same thing.
> 
> My son's recent dissertation was specifically on the
> subject of
> Godel's incompleteness and/or inconsistency in relation
> to systems of
> moral philosophy. Let me see if I can dig you out a copy
> ...
> 
> Ian
> 
> On 8/22/08, Ron Kulp <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com> wrote:
> > Ron:
> > The fallacy, SA, is using a mathematical theorem to
> support
> > a metaphysical understanding. It supposes a cap on
> knowledge
> > and intellect when it is only a rarely used and one of
> many,
> > methods of reasoning.
> >
> >
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> >
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/