[MD] For Bo

[Heather Perella]

     I like that answer.  Good answer.  I understand now.  Thanks.
     Another question, if you will.  Would you say the moq has an axiom or an axiom system?

SA


--- On Fri, 8/22/08, Ron Kulp <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com> wrote:

> From: Ron Kulp <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com>
> Subject: Re: [MD] For Bo
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Date: Friday, August 22, 2008, 7:12 AM
> SA:
> And since these axioms are limited in their understanding
> and analytic
> logic and SOM is built on these axioms, then analytic logic
> and SOM are
> incomplete in their understanding of reality.  Hence, there
> are ways to
> understand reality in other ways that are more complete. 
> By saying
> "understand", I'm referring not only to
> experience but an intellectual
> way to "understand" reality that is not just
> analytical logic and SOM,
> and your saying that these other ways of intellectually
> understand
> reality are even more complete than analytical logic and
> SOM - maybe
> that's what your saying?
> 
> Ron:
> Perhaps they are perhaps they are not, either way it
> emphasizes the
> point
> that MoQ and SOM are contemporary intellectual patterns,
> useful in their
> own ways but neither of them, or any such intellectual
> understanding is
> never
> fully complete. The accuracy of an intellectual
> understanding lies
> within it's value.
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/