[MD] MOWRe: For Bo

[David M]

> Ian said:
> ...Godel is not irrelevant to explaining why moral philosophies can never 
> be (logically) complete and consistent.
>
> dmb says:
> Man, that just kills me. Only a philosophical tyrant could make as 
> assertion like that. You'd have to be a hyper-rationalist and even more 
> insane than Hegel. Logic itself is not logically complete and consistent, 
> let alone any moral philosophy.  Exploring the possibilities and limits of 
> intellect is one of the central points of the MOQ, no? And doesn't that 
> exploration make these kinds of assertions seem thoroughly implausible? 
> Even ridiculous? I think so.

Ian says: moral philosophy cannot be both complete and consistent

DMB says: how can you say that, I agree, but how can you say that, logic 
can't show that, no if you want to say that you have to
mention the MOQ, otherwise you can't join the cult.

DM says: DMB is incomplete and never consistent. But keep working on it DMB 
there's always hope/DQ/potential, even for you.